1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 33 A.D.3d
  5. 33 A.D.3d 570 (2006)
 

NATIONAL ABATEMENT CORP. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.

33 A.D.3d 570 (2006)

824 N.Y.S.2d 230

NATIONAL ABATEMENT CORP. et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 31, 2006.

There is no need to engage in conflicts of laws analysis absent a conflict between the laws of New York and Pennsylvania with respect to the applicability of basic tenets of contract interpretation in determining whether plaintiffs are covered under the additional insured endorsement (see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Stolarz—New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.], 81 N.Y.2d 219, 223 [1993]; see e.g. Ehrlich v Hambrecht,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases