1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 44 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 44 Cal.Rptr.3d 556 (2006)
 

PASADENA METRO BLUE LINE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO

No. B181175.

44 Cal.Rptr.3d 556 (2006)

140 Cal.App.4th 658

PASADENA METRO BLUE LINE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

June 15, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richards, Watson & Gerson, Mitchell E. Abbott, Los Angeles, and Sonali S. Jandial for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Douglas Ditonto and Richard D. Arko, Rosemead; Randall R. Morrow; Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, and Michael M. Berger, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.

RUBIN, J.

Plaintiff Pasadena Metro Blue Line Construction Authority (the Authority) appeals from the summary judgment entered for defendants Southern California Edison Co. (Edison), Southern California Gas Co. (SCG), and Pacific Bell Telephone Co. (PacBell), which determined that those companies did not have to reimburse the Authority for the cost of relocating their utility lines as part of the Authority's construction of a light rail public transit line. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases