In light of the reasonable excuse proffered by defendant-respondent for its delay in answering the complaint, Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting defendant's cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) (see Nason v Fisher,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MISCIAGNU v. OCEAN AVENUE RESTAURANT, INC.
33 A.D.3d 566 (2006)
822 N.Y.S.2d 706
STEFANO MISCIAGNU, Appellant, v. OCEAN AVENUE RESTAURANT, INC., Doing Business as BRIDGEVIEW YACHT CLUB, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 31, 2006.
Decided October 31, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
