IN THE MATTER OF BRITTANY W.


25 A.D.3d 560 (2006)

806 N.Y.S.2d 426

In the Matter of BRITTANY W., an Infant. EILEEN HORN, Respondent; COUNTY OF ROCKLAND, Respondent, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of BRITTANY W., an Infant. CINDY CONKLIN, Appellant; COUNTY OF ROCKLAND, Respondent, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 10, 2006.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, "[t]here was no evidence that the Law Guardian had a conflict of interest or had failed to diligently represent the best interests of the . . . child" (Matter of King v King, 266 A.D.2d 546, 547 [1999]; see also Family Ct Act § 241). The Law Guardian did not show bias against the appellant during the course...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases