1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 150 P.3d
  5. 150 P.3d 432 (2006)
 

LILES v. DAMON CORPORATION

03-3086; A129113.

150 P.3d 432 (2006)

210 Or. App. 303

Dale L. LILES and Karen Marie Liles, Respondents, v. DAMON CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Drew, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the opening brief was Elliott, Ostrander & Preston, P.C. With him on the reply brief were John D. Ostrander and Elliott, Ostrander & Preston, P.C.

Gary E. Norman, Albany, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before LINDER, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and BARRON, Judge pro tempore.

BARRON, J. pro tempore.

Defendant manufacturer appeals a judgment granting plaintiffs recovery under Oregon's Lemon Law, ORS 646.315 to 646.375, after a trial to the court. At trial, defendant moved for what was the equivalent of a motion for judgment of dismissal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. See Lieberfreund v. Gregory, 206 Or.App. 484, 490 n. 5, 136 P.3d 1207 (2006)....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases