1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 137 P.3d
  5. 137 P.3d 445 (2006)
 

CANYON COUNTY BD. OF EQUALIZATION v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY, LLC

No. 31063.

137 P.3d 445 (2006)

143 Idaho 58

CANYON COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION and Twin Falls County Board of Equalization, Petitioners-Respondents, v. The AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY, LLC, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 2006 Term.

June 5, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Chtd., Boise, for appellant. Robert B. Burns argued.

Cantrill, Skinner, Sullivan & King, L.L.P., Boise, for respondents. Robert D. Lewis argued.

TROUT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a district court order concerning the assessed valuation of industrial property owned by appellant The Amalgamated Sugar Company, LLC (Amalgamated, or subsequently known as TASCO) as calculated by respondents Canyon County Board of Equalization and Twin Falls County Board of Equalization (Counties). After conducting a trial de novo, the district court reversed the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (BTA) and adopted the Counties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases