1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 451 F.3d
  5. 451 F.3d 97 (2006)
 

U.S. v. JIMENEZ

Docket No. 05-2221-CR.

451 F.3d 97 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Nelson JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: June 13, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry J. Steinglass, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Harry Sandick, Assistant United States Attorney (Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Karl Metzner, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), New York, NY, for Appellee.

Before WALKER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In United States v. Booker, the Supreme Court held that the mandatory application of the Sentencing Guidelines violates the Sixth Amendment where any fact found by a judge (other than a prior conviction) is necessary to support a sentence greater than that authorized by the facts found solely by a jury or admitted by the defendant. 543 U.S. 220, 244, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The Court-fashioned remedy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases