BURSEY v. S.C. DEPT. OF HEALTH

No. 26166.

369 S.C. 176 (2006)

631 S.E.2d 899

Brett BURSEY and Mining Association of South Carolina, Respondents, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, Defendant, and South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided June 19, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth B. Partlow, of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., and Thomas Grant Eppink, of SCANA Corporation, both of Columbia, for petitioner.

Gregory Jacobs English, of Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, P.A., of Greenville, for respondent, Mining Association of South Carolina.

Brett Bursey, of Lexington, pro se respondent.

Etta R. Williams, of Columbia, for defendant.


Justice MOORE.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Bursey v. South Carolina Dep't of Health and Envtl. Control, 360 S.C. 135, 600 S.E.2d 80 (Ct.App. 2004). We affirm.

PROCEDURAL FACTS

As part of the dam remediation project on Lake Murray, petitioner (SCE & G) planned a back-up dam to be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases