SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent;
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO, et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 26, 2006.
June 26, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Stephen E. Pickett, James M. Lehrer, Rosemead; O'Melveny & Myers, Gordon E. Krischer, Newport Beach, and Joshua A. Shapiro, Los Angeles, for Petitioner.
W. Davis Smith and Georgetta J. Baker for San Diego Gas & Electric Company and Southern California Gas Company as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.
Randolph L. Wu, Dale Holzschuh, San Francisco, and Darwin E. Farrar for Respondent.
Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Rubin & Demain and Scott A. Kronland, San Francisco, for Real Party in Interest State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO.
Reich, Adell, Crost & Cvitan, Alexander B. Cvitan and Andrew L. Birnbaum, Los Angeles, for Real Party in Interest Southern California District Council of Laborers.
Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Sandra R. Benson, Pasadena, Patricia M. Gates and Roberta D. Perkins, Oakland, for Real Party in Interest Northern California Basic Crafts Alliance.
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo, Marc D. Joseph and Gloria D. Smith, South San Francisco, for Real Parties in Interest California State Pipe Trades Council and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.
CROSKEY, Acting P.J.
Southern California Edison Company (Edison) challenges a decision by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) that certain public utilities must require the payment of prevailing wages to workers on energy utility construction projects. Edison contends (1) the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) (29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.) preempts the decision; (2) the PUC committed a prejudicial abuse of discretion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
