The language of the contract at issue was clear and unambiguous that in the event the two arbitrators selected by the parties were stalemated in appointing a third rabbinical arbitrator within 15 days, a court of competent jurisdiction could be asked to make that appointment. Contrary to respondent's contention, the court's enforcement of the arbitration clause pursuant to CPLR article 75 did not constitute an impermissibly excessive entanglement in religion, since no doctrinal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
