As the presentment agency concedes, the court's finding was not based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence established only that before and after the incident appellant and another were in the company of the person who robbed the victim; no evidence was adduced that appellant "solicit[ed], request[ed], command[ed], importune[d], or intentionally aid[ed]" (Penal Law § 20.00) the commission of the crime. As in Matter of Lamar McL. (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.