Substantial evidence, including, in particular, the eyewitness testimony of respondent's investigator, supports the findings that petitioner attempted to administer a prohibited "milkshake" on the day of a race and did so without making reasonable inquiry whether the horse was scheduled to race that day. No basis exists to disturb the hearing officer's findings of credibility (see e.g. Matter of Sachs v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd., Div. of Harness Racing,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
