1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 46 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 476 (2006)
 

PAJARO VALLEY WATER MANAGEMENT v. AMRHEN

No. H027817.

46 Cal.Rptr.3d 476 (2006)

PAJARO VALLEY WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ray AMRHEN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District.

July 26, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & James, Robert K. Johnson, Aptos, Attorneys for Defendants and Appellants Ray Amrhen et al.

Harold Griffith, Attorneys for Amicus Curiae for Appellants Ray Amrhen et al.

Nossman, Guthner, Know & Elliott, Stephen N. Roberts, Nicole A. Tutt, Sophie N. Froelich, San Francisco, Attorneys for Plaintiff and Respondent Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency.

San Diego County Water Authority, Daniel S. Hentschke, General Counsel, San Diego, Attorney for Amicus Curiae for Respondent Association of California Water Agencies.

RUSHING, P.J.

Plaintiff and respondent Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency (Agency) brought this validation proceeding for a judicial determination that its 2003 ordinance increasing the groundwater augmentation fee to be charged to operators of wells within its jurisdiction is valid. Defendants and appellants Ray Amrhein, Guy George, Mark Pista, San Andreas Mutual Water Company, Patrick Layhee, and John Sheffield...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases