Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the court erred in failing, in its charge, to elaborate on the meaning of "forcible stealing" is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to request such a charge, object to the charge as delivered, or request supplemental instructions (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Burch,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.