KALYANARAM v. BURCK

No. 08-05-00132-CV.

225 S.W.3d 291 (2006)

Gurumurthy KALYANARAM, Appellant, v. Dan BURCK, Franklyn Jenifer, Charles Chaffin, Gwen Aguirre, Robert Lovitt, Hasan Pirkul, and Hobson Wildenthal, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.

June 8, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cameron Davis Gray, Law Office of Cameron D. Gray, Dallas, for Appellant.

William T. Deane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for Appellees.

Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.


OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

This is an appeal from a grant of a summary judgment. Appellees moved for both a traditional summary judgment and a no-evidence motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted both motions in favor of Appellees. On appeal, Appellant agues the trial court erred in granting the motions because: (1) Res Judicata does not bar his claim for malicious prosecution; (2) the release agreed to by Appellant does not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases