HAGEL v. PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY

04F-017100; A127444.

135 P.3d 360 (2006)

205 Or. App. 677

Robert J. HAGEL, Appellant, v. PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 10, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig P. Colby, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Richard D. Wasserman, Attorney-in-Charge, Civil/Administrative Appeals Unit, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ORTEGA, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing his complaint, brought under the forcible entry and detainer (FED) law. We reverse.

Plaintiff's amended complaint alleged, in pertinent part:

"Defendant is in possession of the [premises at issue]. "Defendant entered upon the premises with force on Sept. 23, 2004, in violation of ORS 105.105. "Plaintiff is entitled to possession of the premises, because: For several years, until...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases