UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS v. ROSLIN INSTITUTE

Civil Action Nos. 05-353, 05-706. Document Nos. 16, 17.

437 F.Supp.2d 57 (2006)

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, and Advanced Cell Technology, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ROSLIN INSTITUTE, Geron Corporation, and Exeter Life Sciences, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 20, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Gholz, Frank J. West, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiffs.

Charles Edmond Lipsey, I, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., Reston, VA, Lara C. Kelley, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

DENYING THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

These cases come before the court under 35 U.S.C. § 146, and involve a district court review of two decisions by the Board of Patent Appeals. The plaintiffs contend that the defendants are interfering with the plaintiffs' patents for animal cloning (Civ. Action No. 05-353) and methods of producing embryonic stem...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases