While "new facts" existed to support a motion for renewal, viz., Dr. Rudelli's alleged retention as an expert by plaintiff, this retention would not "change the prior determination" (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]) since an expert may always be deposed "upon a showing of special circumstances" (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.