PEOPLE v. HARINARIN


33 A.D.3d 455 (2006)

826 N.Y.S.2d 185

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICKEY HARINARIN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 19, 2006.


Defendant's claim that his attorney's concern about his fee created a conflict vitiating defendant's plea is not reviewable on direct appeal because it turns on matters outside the record, particularly as to the substance of counsel's advice before defendant agreed to the plea, and counsel's reason for giving such advice (see People v Denny, 95 N.Y.2d 921 [2000]). On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases