The court properly denied defendants' motion for summary judgment since questions of fact exist as to the applicability of the emergency doctrine, including whether defendant Kippins kept the vehicle he was driving a safe distance from plaintiff's van, whether he was traveling at an unsafe rate of speed given the rain and wet road, whether he timely applied the brakes, and whether plaintiff's vehicle was propelled backward in a southerly direction into Kippins' vehicle (...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
