Section 1.4 of the parties' Unit Purchase Agreement unambiguously provided that plaintiff sellers would be entitled to an additional purchase price upon a subsequent "sale or other transfer" of the sale units by defendant purchaser. The motion court, taking into consideration the reasonable expectations of the contracting parties, as their agreement clearly evinces when read in part or as a whole (see Sutton v East Riv. Sav. Bank,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GOTHAM PARTNERS, L.P. v. HIGH RIVER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
33 A.D.3d 453 (2006)
824 N.Y.S.2d 2
GOTHAM PARTNERS, L.P., et al., Respondents, v. HIGH RIVER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 19, 2006.
Decided October 19, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
