The court properly excluded hearsay evidence offered by defendant. The evidence consisted of a 911 tape in which an identified caller who was not a witness to the incident provided a description of the assailant that was at variance with the description given by an eyewitness. This eyewitness testified that he never gave the caller any description. We reject defendant's argument that the description on the 911 tape was admissible as a prior inconsistent statement by the eyewitness...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
