Since plaintiffs did not offer any new or additional facts that would have changed the prior determination to dismiss, the motion was in essence one to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see Rosen v Rosenholc,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
REYNOSO v. AMIN
33 A.D.3d 445 (2006)
821 N.Y.S.2d 883
CARL REYNOSO et al., Appellants, v. SAMIR M. AMIN et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 17, 2006.
Decided October 17, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
