1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 29 A.D.3d
  5. 29 A.D.3d 446 (2006)
 

PEOPLE v. DOGGETT

29 A.D.3d 446 (2006)

816 N.Y.S.2d 28

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM DOGGETT, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 23, 2006.

Before permitting defendant to proceed pro se, the court conducted a proper inquiry in which it fully warned defendant of the dangers and disadvantages of representing himself (see People v Arroyo, 98 N.Y.2d 101 [2002]). To the extent that defendant is arguing on appeal that he could not have intelligently waived his right to counsel because he lacked legal knowledge, that argument is without merit. "Neither a defendant's lack of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases