1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 25 A.D.3d
  5. 25 A.D.3d 442 (2006)
 

DORVIL v. HILTON HOTELS CORP.

25 A.D.3d 442 (2006)

807 N.Y.S.2d 369

WAGNER DORVIL, Appellant, v. HILTON HOTELS CORP. et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 17, 2006.

No prima facie case of retaliation under the state Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 296 [1] [e]) was set forth. The in-house investigation conducted by defendant Hilton did not relate to conduct prohibited under the Human Rights Law and was not a "proceeding" for purposes of Executive Law § 296 (1) (e) (see Unotti v American Broadcasting Cos., 273 A.D.2d 68 [2000]). Further, there was no proof that defendants Hilton and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases