STEIN v. STEIN


14 Misc.3d 453 (2006)

825 N.Y.S.2d 335

MARK STEIN, Plaintiff, v. NIMFA STEIN, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Kings County.

November 17, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Curt Arnel, Brooklyn (Angela Scarlato of counsel), for defendant.

Aaron Weitz, New York City, for plaintiff.


OPINION OF THE COURT

JEFFREY S. SUNSHINE, J.

Defendant Nimfa Stein moves for an order declaring the prenuptial agreement between the parties invalid on the grounds that: (1) such agreement was the product of fraud, overreaching and undue influence, and (2) the agreement was not executed in accordance with the acknowledgment requirements established by Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (3). Plaintiff Mark Stein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases