GRASSO, J.
At issue is the propriety of a stop and patfrisk of the defendant. On appeal from his convictions of illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition, the defendant maintains that the motion judge erred in denying his motion to suppress the loaded handgun found by the police. We conclude that the stop, frisk, and seizure exceeded constitutional bounds.
1. Facts. We take the facts from the motion judge's findings
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.