1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 26 A.D.3d
  5. 26 A.D.3d 428 (2006)
 

CHUNG v. PINTO

26 A.D.3d 428 (2006)

809 N.Y.S.2d 572

THEM-TUCK CHUNG et al., Respondents, v. MIGUEL PINTO et al., Defendants, and TRANS CAPITAL RESOURCES, LTD., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 21, 2006.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contentions of the defendant Trans Capital Resources, Ltd. (hereinafter Trans Capital), the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Trans Capital, as the titleholder of the offending vehicle, is an "owner" within the meaning of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 128 and 388 (1) (see Alexander v. Radix,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases