As a general rule, we do not consider an issue on a subsequent appeal which was raised or could have been raised in an earlier appeal which was dismissed for lack of prosecution, although the court has the inherent jurisdiction to do so (see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HEPNER v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
27 A.D.3d 418 (2006)
810 N.Y.S.2d 663
CLIFF HEPNER et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 7, 2006.
March 7, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.