RODMAN v. FRIEDMAN


33 A.D.3d 400 (2006)

826 N.Y.S.2d 1

PAMELA B. RODMAN, Appellant, v. ROBERT H. FRIEDMAN, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 10, 2006.


The court, which has presided over this matter since 1999, properly exercised its discretion in considering the best interests of the child by declining to hold plaintiff in contempt and in instead imposing fines should she fail again to abide by the court's orders regarding visitation and therapy (see Matter of Pignataro v Davis, 8 A.D.3d 487 [2004]). The court also properly exercised its discretion in ordering plaintiff to pay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases