1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 186 S.W.3d
  5. 186 S.W.3d 247 (2006)
 

STEHNO v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.

No. SC 87023.

186 S.W.3d 247 (2006)

John STEHNO, Respondent, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., Appellant, and Amdocs, Ltd., Defendant.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ann K. Covington, K. Lee Marshall, St, Louis, for appellant.

Elaine Drodge Koch, Mikah K. Story, Kansas City, for defendant.

Aaron N. Woods, Lisa C. Bower, Kansas City, for respondent.

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Sprint Spectrum, L.P., appeals a judgment granting John Stehno a new trial on his claim of tortious interference with a business expectancy. Sprint asserts that Stehno did not make a submissible case of tortious interference because he failed to prove: (1) he had a valid, reasonable business expectancy or (2) there was an absence of justification for Sprint's actions. This Court agrees and reverses the judgment.

I. Facts and Procedural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases