1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 139 P.3d
  5. 139 P.3d 292 (2006)
 

LPM CORP. v. SMITH

No. 20050950-CA.

139 P.3d 292 (2006)

2006 UT App 258

LPM CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Paul C. SMITH and Sandra A. Smith, Defendants and Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

June 22, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Kingston, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

Michael R. Johnson and Troy L. Booher, Snell & Wilmer, Salt Lake City, for Appellees.

Before Judges BILLINGS, BENCH, and THORNE.

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

¶ 1 Plaintiff LPM Corporation (LPM) asserts that the trial court erred in granting Defendants Paul C. and Sandra A. Smith's (collectively, the Smiths) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Utah R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Specifically, LPM argues the trial court erred in determining that the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence cannot be applied to obtain an entire parcel of land...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases