The trial court received in evidence a nontestifying codefendant's custodial written and stenographic statements as declarations against penal interest, and also received an audiotaped police-arranged conversation between defendant and the nontestifying codefendant. While defendant objected to this evidence as hearsay, that objection did not preserve a Confrontation Clause claim (People v Kello,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. LOPEZ
25 A.D.3d 385 (2006)
808 N.Y.S.2d 648
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JASON LOPEZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 10, 2006.
January 10, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.