1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 27 A.D.3d
  5. 27 A.D.3d 381 (2006)
 

IN THE MATTER OF PATROLMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK

27 A.D.3d 381 (2006)

812 N.Y.S.2d 62

In the Matter of PATROLMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC., et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants, and NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 28, 2006.

The administrative refusal, on mootness grounds, to determine petitioners' separate improper practice claim was arbitrary and capricious in light of a viable controversy manifested by, among other things, the City's repeated insistence that petitioners, the exclusive bargaining representatives for its members, proceed through another entity that it often worked with only upon consent. In this regard, the administrative determination was not entitled to deference (see Matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases