1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.3d
  4. 14 Misc.3d
  5. 14 Misc.3d 26 (2006)
 

PEOPLE v. BOGOMOLSKY

14 Misc.3d 26 (2006)

829 N.Y.S.2d 803

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NICK BOGOMOLSKY, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

November 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon A. Lefkowitz, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Leonard Joblove and Karol B. Mangum of counsel), for respondent.

PESCE, P.J., and BELEN, J., concur; WESTON PATTERSON, J., dissents in a separate memorandum.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621 [1983]), we determine that it was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 [2] [a]). The proof in the case at bar amply demonstrated that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases