Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to timely serve the summons and complaint and in granting the plaintiff's cross motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b for an extension of time to effect service upon the defendant (see Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.