1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 28 A.D.3d
  5. 28 A.D.3d 365 (2006)
 

VASQUEZ v. RELUZCO

28 A.D.3d 365 (2006)

814 N.Y.S.2d 117

CLARA VASQUEZ et al., Appellants, v. EDUARDO RELUZCO et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 20, 2006.

In opposing summary judgment, plaintiffs never argued the deficiency of the defense neurologist's reports before the motion court. Their argument in this regard is thus unpreserved for appellate review (Matter of Stevens v Wing, 293 A.D.2d 49, 55 [2002], lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 616 [2002]; Murray v City of New York, 195 A.D.2d 379, 381 [1993]), and we decline to review it. Were we to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases