The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence established that defendant and his coconspirators entered into an agreement to kill defendant's rival for a specific price, with the killing to take place after certain contingencies had occurred. Defendant expected these contingent events to take place within a short time, and the fact that he insisted the killing be deferred until after their occurrence neither...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
