MATERA v. McLEOD

No. B186714.

51 Cal.Rptr.3d 331 (2006)

145 Cal.App.4th 44

Denise MATERA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. James MCLEOD et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three.

November 22, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harding, Larmore, Mullen, Jakle, Kutcher & Kozal, Dennis M. Mullen, Christine Arden, Santa Monica; Law Offices of Roxanne Huddleston and Roxanne Huddleston, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants.

Kulik, Gottesman, Mouton & Siegel and David S. Olson, Sherman Oaks, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


CROSKEY, J.

James McLeod and Carolyn Minium appeal a default judgment and the denial of their motion for relief from the defaults and default judgment. Defendants moved for relief under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b)1 based on their attorney's neglect in failing to comply with a discovery order and failing to oppose a motion for a terminating sanction. On appeal, they contend plaintiffs failed to provide actual notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases