1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 145 P.3d
  5. 145 P.3d 237 (2006)
 

STATE v. SCATCHARD

02CR1813MI; A124319.

145 P.3d 237 (2006)

208 Or. App. 315

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Eric Arthur SCATCHARD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Lee argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Lee & Kaser, P.C.

Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and BARRON, Judge pro tempore.

BARRON, J. pro tempore.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 on the ground that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress. Specifically, defendant argues that he was illegally seized when a volunteer fireman told him to stay at the scene of an accident until the police arrived. We affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress because we conclude the volunteer fireman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases