ORENSTEIN v. BRUM


27 A.D.3d 352 (2006)

811 N.Y.S.2d 644

DONALD ORENSTEIN, Appellant, v. IRVIN BRUM et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 23, 2006.


Defendants' motions, while untimely, were properly entertained upon a showing of good cause for the delay (CPLR 3212 [a]; see Brill v City of New York, 2 N.Y.3d 648, 652 [2004]). It appears that plaintiff made a motion to amend the complaint shortly before the note of issue was filed by a former codefendant; that in their promptly made motion to strike the jury demand in that note of issue, defendants advised that they intended to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases