By making generalized objections, and by failing to request any further relief after the court sustained his objection, defendant failed to preserve any of his present challenges to remarks made by the assistant district attorney during voir dire of prospective jurors, opening statement and summation, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal (see People v Overlee,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. REYES
34 A.D.3d 331 (2006)
824 N.Y.S.2d 261
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS REYES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 16, 2006.
Decided November 16, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
