SILVERMAN v. CLARK


35 A.D.3d 1 (2006)

822 N.Y.S.2d 9

RHONA A. SILVERMAN, Respondent, v. BRUCE G. CLARK et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 26, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter L. Gale, Port Washington, for appellants.

Rhona A. Silverman, New York City, pro se, and McCabe Flynn & Arangio, LLP, New York City (William B. Flynn of counsel), for Rhona A. Silverman, respondent.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS and McGUIRE, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

GONZALEZ, J.

In this action for defamation and breach of contract, we must decide whether letters written by defendant Bruce Clark to two former clients disparaging the professional competence of plaintiff, his former associate attorney who had recently resigned from the firm and taken clients with her, are protected by the absolute defense of truth, or by a qualified or absolute privilege. We find that although neither privilege is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases