Were we to find that the showup identification by Robert Castillo was conducted in an unduly suggestive manner, and were we to find that both the showup and in-court identifications made by the witness in question should not have been admitted, we would find the error to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because of the overwhelming proof of defendant's guilt, which included scientific evidence (see People v Crimmins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. GUERRA
35 A.D.3d 323 (2006)
830 N.Y.S.2d 19
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS GUERRA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 28, 2006.
Decided December 28, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
