1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 204 S.W.3d
  5. 204 S.W.3d 145 (2006)
 

BENNETT v. DITTO

No. 2005-CA-001823-MR.

204 S.W.3d 145 (2006)

Katie Beth BENNETT, Appellant, v. Bethane DITTO and Ruth Warmser, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

September 29, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Key Schoen, Sales, Tillman, Wallbaum Catlett & Satterley, PLLC, Louisville, KY, for Appellant.

Steven R. Crebessa, Brandenburg, KY, for Appellees.

Before TAYLOR, Judge; BUCKINGHAM, Senior Judge; MILLER, Special Judge.

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

Katie Beth Bennett, as a beneficiary under the will of Donna H. Wiseman, deceased, presents a novel issue in this appeal as to whether Wiseman's alleged signature on her holographic will complies with the statutory mandates of Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 394.040 and KRS 446.060. Bennett appeals from an August 1, 2005, opinion and order of the Meade Circuit Court holding that the Meade District Court erroneously admitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases