BOOTH v. KRIEGEL


36 A.D.3d 312 (2006)

825 N.Y.S.2d 193

CONSTANCE BOOTH, Respondent, v. I. STANLEY KRIEGEL, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 16, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Levine & Grossman, Mineola (Frank Torres of counsel), for appellant.

Maryann Peronti, New York City, for respondent.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., GONZALEZ, CATTERSON and MALONE, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

FRIEDMAN, J.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether, under the doctrine of continuous representation, the running of the statute of limitations on a cause of action for accounting malpractice was tolled for a period of more than a decade and a half during which the accountant made the same mistake in preparing successive tax returns for his client. We hold that the continuous representation doctrine does not apply under these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases