1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 49 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 49 Cal.Rptr.3d 296 (2006)
 

FIRST FEDERAL v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B191287.

49 Cal.Rptr.3d 296 (2006)

143 Cal.App.4th 310

FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF CALIFORNIA, Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Respondent; Prestige of Beverly Hills, Inc., Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Seven.

September 25, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Epport, Richman & Robbins, Steven N. Richman and Lawrence A. Abelson, Los Angeles, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Law Offices of Frank A. Satalino and Frank A. Satalino for Real Party in Interest.

ZELON, J.

Petitioner, First Federal Bank of California, seeks a writ of mandamus, asserting that the denial of its peremptory challenge after remand from this Court violated Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6. Because our remand required the trial court to conduct additional proceedings on the issue of attorney's fees, we find the peremptory challenge should have been allowed, grant the writ, and remand.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases