1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 35 A.D.3d
  5. 35 A.D.3d 299 (2006)
 

PEOPLE v. GRAHAM

35 A.D.3d 299 (2006)

825 N.Y.S.2d 361

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE GRAHAM, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 21, 2006.

Defendant's argument that the court incorrectly assessed certain risk factor points is academic, because it is undisputed that even without the five points at issue, defendant would still qualify as a level three sex offender. Defendant's argument for a downward departure is unpreserved because he made no such request to the hearing court. In any event, there is no basis in the record for such a departure (see People v Mabb, 32 A.D.3d 1135

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases