As required by section 23 of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), Supreme Court should have informed defendant, at the outset of the resentencing hearing, of the determinate sentence the court intended to impose, and further notified defendant that such new sentence would be imposed unless he withdrew his application for resentencing or appealed the order. Nevertheless, we reject defendant's assertion that he is entitled to a new resentencing hearing. At the hearing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
