1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 35 A.D.3d
  5. 35 A.D.3d 291 (2006)
 

DIAZ KALISCH v. MAPLE TRADE FINANCE CORPORATION

35 A.D.3d 291 (2006)

827 N.Y.S.2d 40

MAYRA DIAZ KALISCH, Appellant, v. MAPLE TRADE FINANCE CORPORATION, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 21, 2006.

In order to vacate her default, plaintiff would be required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at the conference and a meritorious cause of action (Espinoza v Concordia Intl. Forwarding Corp., 32 A.D.3d 326 [2006]). Assuming, arguendo, that plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at a scheduled conference, she wholly failed to establish a meritorious cause of action. No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases